SYMBOL COMPLEXITY AND SYMBOL IDENTIFICATION WITH ROTATED SYMBOLSELEY MG.1983; ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1983; VOL. 53; NO 1; PP. 27-35; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF THE COMPONENTS OF DISPARITY IN WILDE'S DOT-ROW PHENOMENONVAN DER MEER HC.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH; ISSN 0340-0727; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 127-134; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

INFANT RESPONSE TO IMPENDING OPTICAL COLLISIONDUNKELD J; BOWER TGR.1980; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 5; PP. 549-554; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ROTATION OF OBJECTS IN PICTURES VIEWED AT AN ANGLE: EVIDENCE FOR DIFFERENT PROPERTIES OF TWO TYPES OF PICTORIAL SPACESGOLDSTEIN EB.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 78-87; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT CONSTANCY: COHERENCE OF A SIMULATED ROTATING SPHERE IN NOISEPETERSIK JT.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 4; PP. 328-335; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF STABILITY IN THE PERCEIVED FORM OF OBJECTS ROTATING IN DEPTH.RANKIN NO; YABLICK GS.1976; PSYCHOL. RES.; GERM.; DA. 1976; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 51-65; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

ROTATION JUDGEMENTS AND DEPTH JUDGEMENTS: SEPARATE OR DEPENDENT PROCESSES.PETERSIK JT.1980; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 27; NO 6; PP. 588-590; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE DETECTION OF ROTATION IN RANDOM-DOT PATTERNSBELL HH; LAPPIN JS.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 5; PP. 415-417; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

COLOR-SELECTIVE TILT AFTEREFFECTS WITH SUBJECTIVE CONTOURS.SMITH AT; OVER R.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 305-308; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

DIRECTIONAL SYMMETRY IN THE SPIRAL AFTEREFFECTHERSHENSON M.1982; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 3; PART 2; PP. 1203-1208; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL FACTORS ON THE PERCEPTION OF STROBOSCOPIC ROTATION SIMULATIONSPETERSIK JT.1980; PERCEPTION; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 271-283; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

AMPLITUDE, FREQUENCY AND PHASE DETERMINANTS OF PERCEIVED ROTATIONS AND RIGIDITY IN THE KINETIC DEPTH EFFECTCAELLI TM.1980; BIOL. CYBERN.; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 36; NO 4; PP. 213-219; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

LOCUS OF ROTATION EFFECTS IN RECOGNITION.CAVANAGH P.1977; BULL. PSYCHOM. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 101-104; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

VERNIER OFFSET PRODUCED BY ROTARY TARGET MOTION.MATIN L; BOFF KR; POLA J et al.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 138-142; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SHAPE, ORIENTATION, AND APPARENT ROTATIONAL MOTIONFARRELL JE; SHEPARD RN.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 477-486; BIBL. 39 REF.Article

THE INTERFERENCE OF A BASELINE WITH CHILDREN'S ORIENTATION JUDGEMENT NEED NOT ENTIRELY MASK THEIR CONTEXTUAL RESPONSIVENESSFREEMAN NH; KELHAM SE.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. A, HUM. EXP. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 145-154; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

VISUALLY INDUCED TILT AFFECTS FORM PERCEPTIONMC ADIE PJ; STEINBACH MJ.1981; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 5; PP. 525-530; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

GRATING ACUITY ALONG THE VERTICAL MERIDIAN AS A FUNCTION OF GRATING ORIENTATIONKITTERLE FL; KAYE RS; SAMUELS J et al.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 5; PP. 401-402; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

KNOWING AND IMAGING SPATIAL RELATIONSDEAN AL.1979; INTERNATION. J. BEHAV. DEVELOP.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 235-252; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEOUS SIMULATIONS OF TWO ROTATING SPHERES IN THE SAME VISUAL LOCALEPETERSIK JT.1979; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 131-134; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

A CONTINUUM OF DIMENSIONAL SEPARABILITYSMITH LB; KILROY MC.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 4; PP. 285-291; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

PSYCHOPHYSICAL DETERMINATION OF THE PHASE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE VESTIBULAR SYSTEM OF MAN FOR SINUSOIDAL OSCILLATION IN YAW.RODENBURG M; MAAS AJJ.1977; O.R.L.; SWITZ.; DA. 1977; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 82-93; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

TWO PARAMETERS MEASURE APPARENT CHANGE DURING REPETITIVE STIMULATION.VAEGAN.1976; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 28; NO 4; PP. 583-589; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

NAIVE PHYSICS: THE CURVILINEAR IMPETUS PRINCIPLE AND ITS ROLE IN INTERACTIONS WITH MOVING OBJECTSMCCLOSKEY M; KOHL D.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. LEARNING, MEMORY, AND COGNITION; ISSN 0278-7393; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 1; PP. 146-156; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

THE USE OF OCCLUSION TO RESOLVE AMBIGUITY IN PARALLEL PROJECTIONSBRAUNSTEIN ML; ANDERSEN GJ; RIEFER DM et al.1982; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 261-267; BIBL. 22 REF.Article